↓ Skip to main content

Interventions to improve continuity of care in the follow-up of patients with cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
394 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions to improve continuity of care in the follow-up of patients with cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007672.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michèle Aubin, Anik Giguère, Mélanie Martin, René Verreault, Margaret I. Fitch, Arminée Kazanjian, Pierre-Hugues Carmichael

Abstract

Care from the family physician is generally interrupted when patients with cancer come under the care of second-line and third-line healthcare professionals who may also manage the patient's comorbid conditions. This situation may lead to fragmented and uncoordinated care, and results in an increased likelihood of not receiving recommended preventive services or recommended care.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 394 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Unknown 392 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 69 18%
Researcher 49 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 12%
Student > Bachelor 45 11%
Student > Postgraduate 28 7%
Other 63 16%
Unknown 91 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 131 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 61 15%
Psychology 32 8%
Social Sciences 20 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 3%
Other 42 11%
Unknown 97 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#5,753,089
of 21,528,315 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,683
of 12,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,502
of 143,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,528,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.