↓ Skip to main content

Therapeutic ultrasound for chronic low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
48 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Therapeutic ultrasound for chronic low back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009169.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Safoora Ebadi, Nicholas Henschke, Bijan Forogh, Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari, Maurits W van Tulder, Arash Babaei-Ghazani, Ehsan Fallah

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 80 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 19%
Student > Master 12 15%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 6 7%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 20 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 22%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 26 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2020.
All research outputs
#687,191
of 16,388,656 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,815
of 11,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,656
of 290,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,388,656 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.