↓ Skip to main content

The implementation of the functional task exercise programme for elderly people living at home

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The implementation of the functional task exercise programme for elderly people living at home
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-13-128
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margot A H Fleuren, Susan Vrijkotte, Marielle P Jans, Renske Pin, Ariette van Hespen, Nico L U van Meeteren, Petra C Siemonsma

Abstract

The Functional Task Exercise programme is an evidence-based exercise programme for elderly people living at home. It enhances physical capacity with sustainable effects. FTE is provided by physiotherapists and remedial therapists. Although the intervention was found to be effective in a Randomised Controlled Trial, we may not assume that therapists will automatically supply the programme or that elderly people will automatically join the programme. This study protocol focuses on identifying determinants of implementation, developing implementation strategies and studying the effects of the implementation in daily practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Austria 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 119 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Researcher 7 6%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 35 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 25 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 18%
Sports and Recreations 9 7%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Psychology 7 6%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 40 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2012.
All research outputs
#13,868,345
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,016
of 4,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,240
of 164,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#28
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.