↓ Skip to main content

The battle for truth: How online newspaper commenters defend their censored expressions

Overview of attention for article published in Poetics, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 396)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The battle for truth: How online newspaper commenters defend their censored expressions
Published in
Poetics, June 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.poetic.2019.101423
Authors

Katrine Fangen, Carina Riborg Holter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 8 23%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Master 3 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 7 20%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 31%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 12 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,547,123
of 18,430,950 outputs
Outputs from Poetics
#44
of 396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,233
of 297,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Poetics
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,430,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.