↓ Skip to main content

Nonconsensual Dose Reduction Mandates are Not Justified Clinically or Ethically: An Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 1,177)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
166 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nonconsensual Dose Reduction Mandates are Not Justified Clinically or Ethically: An Analysis
Published in
The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, January 2021
DOI 10.1177/1073110520935337
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan G. Kertesz, Ajay Manhapra, Adam J. Gordon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 166 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 27%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 14%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Unknown 6 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 123. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2022.
All research outputs
#278,502
of 22,579,714 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
#18
of 1,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,898
of 493,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
#2
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,579,714 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 493,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.