↓ Skip to main content

Nonconsensual Dose Reduction Mandates are Not Justified Clinically or Ethically: An Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 1,005)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
163 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nonconsensual Dose Reduction Mandates are Not Justified Clinically or Ethically: An Analysis
Published in
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, January 2021
DOI 10.1177/1073110520935337
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan G. Kertesz, Ajay Manhapra, Adam J. Gordon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 163 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 50%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 75%
Neuroscience 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 126. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2021.
All research outputs
#188,229
of 17,469,628 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
#12
of 1,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,183
of 293,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,469,628 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them