↓ Skip to main content

Reply to comment by Jason E. Smerdon et al. on “Robustness of proxy‐based climate field reconstruction methods”

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Geophysical Research, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Reply to comment by Jason E. Smerdon et al. on “Robustness of proxy‐based climate field reconstruction methods”
Published in
Journal of Geophysical Research, September 2008
DOI 10.1029/2008jd009964
Authors

Scott Rutherford, Michael E. Mann, Eugene Wahl, Caspar Ammann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 36%
Professor 3 27%
Student > Master 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 64%
Environmental Science 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2020.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#11,280
of 12,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,832
of 98,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#124
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.