You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Emancipation cannot be programmed: blind spots of algorithmic facilitation in online deliberation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Contemporary Politics, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1080/13569775.2020.1791306 |
| Authors |
Nardine Alnemr |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 7 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 10% |
| United States | 4 | 8% |
| Spain | 4 | 8% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 18 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 69% |
| Scientists | 12 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 22% |
| Researcher | 6 | 17% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 10 | 28% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 17 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,017,687
of 25,321,938 outputs
Outputs from Contemporary Politics
#16
of 312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,281
of 404,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Contemporary Politics
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,321,938 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.