You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of camera placement for detection of free‐ranging carnivores; implications for assessing population changes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Solutions and Evidence, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/2688-8319.12018 |
| Authors |
Hayley M. Geyle, Michael Stevens, Ryan Duffy, Leanne Greenwood, Dale G. Nimmo, Derek Sandow, Ben Thomas, John White, Euan G. Ritchie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 19 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 8% |
| Curaçao | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| New Caledonia | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 24 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 62% |
| Scientists | 22 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 11 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 27% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2021.
All research outputs
#900,743
of 24,605,383 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Solutions and Evidence
#47
of 265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,027
of 402,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Solutions and Evidence
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,605,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.