↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of camera placement for detection of free‐ranging carnivores; implications for assessing population changes

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Solutions and Evidence, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 168)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
64 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of camera placement for detection of free‐ranging carnivores; implications for assessing population changes
Published in
Ecological Solutions and Evidence, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/2688-8319.12018
Authors

Hayley M. Geyle, Michael Stevens, Ryan Duffy, Leanne Greenwood, Dale G. Nimmo, Derek Sandow, Ben Thomas, John White, Euan G. Ritchie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 9 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 11 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 24%
Unspecified 3 9%
Chemistry 1 3%
Unknown 10 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2021.
All research outputs
#757,116
of 22,254,262 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Solutions and Evidence
#35
of 168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,669
of 308,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Solutions and Evidence
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,254,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.