↓ Skip to main content

Physical training for bronchiectasis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physical training for bronchiectasis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2002
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002166
Authors

Judy M Bradley, Fidelma Moran, Michael Greenstone

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 90 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 21%
Student > Master 18 19%
Unspecified 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Researcher 8 8%
Other 23 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 47%
Unspecified 18 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 15%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 10 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2016.
All research outputs
#7,562,084
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,107
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,327
of 278,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#88
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.