↓ Skip to main content

Penalized for Personality: A Case Study of Asian-Origin Disadvantage at the Point of Hire

Overview of attention for article published in Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 251)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Penalized for Personality: A Case Study of Asian-Origin Disadvantage at the Point of Hire
Published in
Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, May 2020
DOI 10.1177/2332649220922270
Authors

Koji Chavez

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2020.
All research outputs
#887,223
of 15,703,565 outputs
Outputs from Sociology of Race and Ethnicity
#40
of 251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,975
of 270,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sociology of Race and Ethnicity
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,703,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.