You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Araceae do Parque Nacional do Caparaó, MG-ES, Brasil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Rodriguésia, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1590/2175-7860202071065 |
| Authors |
Mel de Castro Camelo, Marcus Alberto Nadruz Coelho, Lúcio S. Leoni, Lívia Godinho Temponi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2022.
All research outputs
#6,553,692
of 23,220,133 outputs
Outputs from Rodriguésia
#19
of 246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,226
of 457,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rodriguésia
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,220,133 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 246 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.