↓ Skip to main content

The quality of clinical practice guidelines for preoperative care using the AGREE II instrument: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The quality of clinical practice guidelines for preoperative care using the AGREE II instrument: a systematic review
Published in
Systematic Reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13643-020-01404-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Agustín Ciapponi, Elena Tapia-López, Sacha Virgilio, Ariel Bardach

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Lecturer 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 14 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Unspecified 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,464,814
of 23,929,753 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#662
of 2,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,713
of 399,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#22
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,929,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.