↓ Skip to main content

Sex differences in neural and behavioral signatures of cooperation revealed by fNIRS hyperscanning

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
32 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
53 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sex differences in neural and behavioral signatures of cooperation revealed by fNIRS hyperscanning
Published in
Scientific Reports, June 2016
DOI 10.1038/srep26492
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph M. Baker, Ning Liu, Xu Cui, Pascal Vrticka, Manish Saggar, S. M. Hadi Hosseini, Allan L. Reiss

Abstract

Researchers from multiple fields have sought to understand how sex moderates human social behavior. While over 50 years of research has revealed differences in cooperation behavior of males and females, the underlying neural correlates of these sex differences have not been explained. A missing and fundamental element of this puzzle is an understanding of how the sex composition of an interacting dyad influences the brain and behavior during cooperation. Using fNIRS-based hyperscanning in 111 same- and mixed-sex dyads, we identified significant behavioral and neural sex-related differences in association with a computer-based cooperation task. Dyads containing at least one male demonstrated significantly higher behavioral performance than female/female dyads. Individual males and females showed significant activation in the right frontopolar and right inferior prefrontal cortices, although this activation was greater in females compared to males. Female/female dyad's exhibited significant inter-brain coherence within the right temporal cortex, while significant coherence in male/male dyads occurred in the right inferior prefrontal cortex. Significant coherence was not observed in mixed-sex dyads. Finally, for same-sex dyads only, task-related inter-brain coherence was positively correlated with cooperation task performance. Our results highlight multiple important and previously undetected influences of sex on concurrent neural and behavioral signatures of cooperation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 207 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 19%
Researcher 35 17%
Student > Master 29 14%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Professor 8 4%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 44 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 55 26%
Neuroscience 50 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Engineering 9 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 3%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 58 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 298. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2020.
All research outputs
#114,942
of 25,166,481 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#1,420
of 138,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,328
of 348,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#40
of 3,586 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,166,481 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 138,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,586 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.