You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
2020 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Management of Bleeding in Patients on Oral Anticoagulants A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.053 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gordon F Tomaselli, Kenneth W Mahaffey, Adam Cuker, Paul P Dobesh, John U Doherty, John W Eikelboom, Roberta Florido, Ty J Gluckman, William J Hucker, Roxana Mehran, Steven R Messé, Alexander C Perino, Fatima Rodriguez, Ravindra Sarode, Deborah M Siegal, Barbara S Wiggins |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 425 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 76 | 18% |
| Spain | 42 | 10% |
| Mexico | 35 | 8% |
| Colombia | 13 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 10 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 8 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 7 | 2% |
| Brazil | 6 | 1% |
| Peru | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 63 | 15% |
| Unknown | 160 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 327 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 56 | 13% |
| Scientists | 32 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 272 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 39 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 9% |
| Researcher | 24 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 41 | 15% |
| Unknown | 94 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 99 | 36% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 46 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 1% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Unknown | 102 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 290. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#124,004
of 25,877,363 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#281
of 16,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,193
of 431,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#6
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,877,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.