↓ Skip to main content

Social Media Growth at Annual Medical Society Meetings: A Comparative Analysis of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology to Other Medical Specialties

Overview of attention for article published in Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social Media Growth at Annual Medical Society Meetings: A Comparative Analysis of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology to Other Medical Specialties
Published in
Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology, June 2020
DOI 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.06.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shermeen Sheikh, Mikin V. Patel, Yaerin Song, Rakesh Navuluri, Steven Zangan, Osman Ahmed

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2020.
All research outputs
#13,660,026
of 15,482,859 outputs
Outputs from Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
#211
of 239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,381
of 191,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
#15
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,482,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.