↓ Skip to main content

Symphysial fundal height (SFH) measurement in pregnancy for detecting abnormal fetal growth.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Symphysial fundal height (SFH) measurement in pregnancy for detecting abnormal fetal growth.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008136.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Peter J, Ho JJ, Valliapan J, Sivasangari S, Robert Peter J; Ho JJ; Valliapan J; Sivasangari S

Abstract

Symphysis fundal height (SFH) measurement is commonly practiced primarily to detect fetal intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Undiagnosed IUGR may lead to fetal death as well as increase perinatal mortality and morbidity.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 48 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 13%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 17%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Computer Science 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2014.
All research outputs
#769,682
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,894
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,074
of 112,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.