You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improving Primary Care After Stroke (IPCAS) randomised controlled trial: protocol for a multidimensional process evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036879 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Raisa Jessica Aquino, Ricky Mullis, Elizabeth Kreit, Vicki Johnson, Julie Grant, Lisa Lim, Stephen Sutton, Jonathan Mant |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 69% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 44% |
| Scientists | 6 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Librarian | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,010,496
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#3,864
of 25,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,354
of 429,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#88
of 586 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 586 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.