↓ Skip to main content

Fyn depletion ameliorates tauP301L-induced neuropathology

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica Communications, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fyn depletion ameliorates tauP301L-induced neuropathology
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica Communications, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40478-020-00979-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guanghao Liu, Kimberly L. Fiock, Yona Levites, Todd E. Golde, Marco M. Hefti, Gloria Lee

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 43%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 57%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,417,726
of 16,028,822 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#174
of 944 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,724
of 292,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,028,822 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 944 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them