↓ Skip to main content

Forum: CRISPR roundtable with Doudna and Liu

Overview of attention for news story in Nature Biotechnology
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Forum: CRISPR roundtable with Doudna and Liu
Published by
Nature Biotechnology, July 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41587-020-0619-8
Pubmed ID

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 40%
Computer Science 1 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,996,435
of 18,571,001 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#4,866
of 7,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,856
of 296,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#73
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,571,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,524 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.