↓ Skip to main content

Prevention of depression through nutritional strategies in high-risk persons: rationale and design of the MooDFOOD prevention trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
550 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevention of depression through nutritional strategies in high-risk persons: rationale and design of the MooDFOOD prevention trial
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12888-016-0900-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miquel Roca, Elisabeth Kohls, Margalida Gili, Ed Watkins, Matthew Owens, Ulrich Hegerl, Gerard van Grootheest, Mariska Bot, Mieke Cabout, Ingeborg A. Brouwer, Marjolein Visser, Brenda W. Penninx, on behalf of the MooDFOOD Prevention Trial Investigators

Abstract

Obesity and depression are two prevalent conditions that are costly to individuals and society. The bidirectional association of obesity with depression, in which unhealthy dietary patterns may play an important role, has been well established. Few experimental studies have been conducted to investigate whether supplementing specific nutrients or improving diet and food-related behaviors can prevent depression in overweight persons. The MooDFOOD prevention trial examines the feasibility and effectiveness of two different nutritional strategies [multi-nutrient supplementation and food-related behavioral change therapy (FBC)] to prevent depression in individuals who are overweight and have elevated depressive symptoms but who are not currently or in the last 6 months meeting criteria for an episode of major depressive disorder (MDD). The randomized controlled prevention trial has a two-by-two factorial design: participants are randomized to daily multi-nutrient supplement (omega-3 fatty acids, calcium, selenium, B-11 vitamin and D-3 vitamin) versus placebo, and/or FBC therapy sessions versus usual care. Interventions last 12 months. In total 1000 participants aged 18-75 years with body mass index between 25-40 kg/m(2) and with a Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score ≥ 5 will be recruited at four study sites in four European countries. Baseline and follow-up assessments take place at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months. Primary endpoint is the onset of an episode of MDD, assessed according to DSM-IV based criteria using the MINI 5.0 interview. Depressive symptoms, anxiety, food and eating behavior, physical activity and health related quality of life are secondary outcomes. During the intervention, compliance, adverse events and potentially mediating variables are carefully monitored. The trial aims to provide a better understanding of the causal role of specific nutrients, overall diet, and food-related behavior change with respect to the incidence of MDD episodes. This knowledge will be used to develop and disseminate innovative evidence-based, feasible, and effective nutritional public health strategies for the prevention of clinical depression. ClinicalTrials.gov. Number of identification: NCT02529423 . August 2015.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 550 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 549 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 90 16%
Student > Bachelor 88 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 8%
Researcher 36 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 5%
Other 97 18%
Unknown 167 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 85 15%
Psychology 77 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 3%
Other 67 12%
Unknown 191 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,154,948
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#786
of 5,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,259
of 355,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#17
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.