↓ Skip to main content

Elevated Glucose Levels Favor SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Monocyte Response through a HIF-1α/Glycolysis-Dependent Axis

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Metabolism (Science Direct), July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 3,203)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
23 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1220 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
3 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
536 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
746 Mendeley
Title
Elevated Glucose Levels Favor SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Monocyte Response through a HIF-1α/Glycolysis-Dependent Axis
Published in
Cell Metabolism (Science Direct), July 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.07.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Campos Codo, Gustavo Gastão Davanzo, Lauar de Brito Monteiro, Gabriela Fabiano de Souza, Stéfanie Primon Muraro, João Victor Virgilio-da-Silva, Juliana Silveira Prodonoff, Victor Corasolla Carregari, Carlos Alberto Oliveira de Biagi Junior, Fernanda Crunfli, Jeffersson Leandro Jimenez Restrepo, Pedro Henrique Vendramini, Guilherme Reis-de-Oliveira, Karina Bispo Dos Santos, Daniel A Toledo-Teixeira, Pierina Lorencini Parise, Matheus Cavalheiro Martini, Rafael Elias Marques, Helison R Carmo, Alexandre Borin, Laís Durço Coimbra, Vinícius O Boldrini, Natalia S Brunetti, Andre S Vieira, Eli Mansour, Raisa G Ulaf, Ana F Bernardes, Thyago A Nunes, Luciana C Ribeiro, Andre C Palma, Marcus V Agrela, Maria Luiza Moretti, Andrei C Sposito, Fabrício Bíscaro Pereira, Licio Augusto Velloso, Marco Aurélio Ramirez Vinolo, André Damasio, José Luiz Proença-Módena, Robson Francisco Carvalho, Marcelo A Mori, Daniel Martins-de-Souza, Helder I Nakaya, Alessandro S Farias, Pedro M Moraes-Vieira

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,220 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 746 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 746 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 96 13%
Student > Master 89 12%
Researcher 74 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 10%
Other 38 5%
Other 119 16%
Unknown 258 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 124 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 119 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 63 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 3%
Other 88 12%
Unknown 294 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 998. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#16,483
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#37
of 3,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#740
of 414,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#3
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 74.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.