↓ Skip to main content

Elevated Glucose Levels Favor SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Monocyte Response through a HIF-1α/Glycolysis-Dependent Axis

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Metabolism (Science Direct), September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 2,537)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1169 tweeters
reddit
3 Redditors
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
Title
Elevated Glucose Levels Favor SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Monocyte Response through a HIF-1α/Glycolysis-Dependent Axis
Published in
Cell Metabolism (Science Direct), September 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.07.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Campos Codo, Gustavo Gastão Davanzo, Lauar de Brito Monteiro, Gabriela Fabiano de Souza, Stéfanie Primon Muraro, João Victor Virgilio-da-Silva, Juliana Silveira Prodonoff, Victor Corasolla Carregari, Carlos Alberto Oliveira de Biagi Junior, Fernanda Crunfli, Jeffersson Leandro Jimenez Restrepo, Pedro Henrique Vendramini, Guilherme Reis-de-Oliveira, Karina Bispo dos Santos, Daniel A. Toledo-Teixeira, Pierina Lorencini Parise, Matheus Cavalheiro Martini, Rafael Elias Marques, Helison R. Carmo, Alexandre Borin, Laís Durço Coimbra, Vinícius O. Boldrini, Natalia S. Brunetti, Andre S. Vieira, Eli Mansour, Raisa G. Ulaf, Ana F. Bernardes, Thyago A. Nunes, Luciana C. Ribeiro, Andre C. Palma, Marcus V. Agrela, Maria Luiza Moretti, Andrei C. Sposito, Fabrício Bíscaro Pereira, Licio Augusto Velloso, Marco Aurélio Ramirez Vinolo, André Damasio, José Luiz Proença-Módena, Robson Francisco Carvalho, Marcelo A. Mori, Daniel Martins-de-Souza, Helder I. Nakaya, Alessandro S. Farias, Pedro M. Moraes-Vieira

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,169 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 267 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 46 17%
Student > Bachelor 42 16%
Student > Master 37 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 12%
Other 16 6%
Other 44 16%
Unknown 51 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 53 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 52 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 21 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 4%
Other 36 13%
Unknown 76 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 959. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2021.
All research outputs
#8,210
of 17,136,794 outputs
Outputs from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#25
of 2,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#483
of 237,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#2
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,136,794 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 58.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.