↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of Trade-Offs Between Biodiversity, Carbon Farming and Agricultural Development in Northern Australia Reveals the Benefits of Strategic Planning

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
36 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of Trade-Offs Between Biodiversity, Carbon Farming and Agricultural Development in Northern Australia Reveals the Benefits of Strategic Planning
Published in
Conservation Letters, June 2016
DOI 10.1111/conl.12255
Authors

Morán‐Ordóñez, Alejandra, Whitehead, Amy L, Luck, Gary W, Cook, Garry D, Maggini, Ramona, Fitzsimons, James A, Wintle, Brendan A, Alejandra Morán-Ordóñez, Amy L Whitehead, Gary W Luck, Garry D Cook, Ramona Maggini, James A Fitzsimons, Brendan A Wintle

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 3%
Australia 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 60 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 26%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Unspecified 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 37%
Environmental Science 21 32%
Unspecified 8 12%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 6 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2017.
All research outputs
#467,415
of 12,357,891 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#222
of 694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,359
of 274,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#15
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,357,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 694 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.