↓ Skip to main content

Stable isotope analysis of multiple tissues from Hawaiian honeycreepers indicates elevational movement

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stable isotope analysis of multiple tissues from Hawaiian honeycreepers indicates elevational movement
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2020
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0235752
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristina L. Paxton, Jeffery F. Kelly, Sandra M. Pletchet, Eben H. Paxton

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Unspecified 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 27%
Unspecified 3 14%
Environmental Science 3 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2020.
All research outputs
#6,853,016
of 24,836,260 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#92,379
of 215,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,368
of 402,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,052
of 2,721 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,836,260 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,721 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.