You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Stable isotope analysis of multiple tissues from Hawaiian honeycreepers indicates elevational movement
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2020
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0235752 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kristina L. Paxton, Jeffery F. Kelly, Sandra M. Pletchet, Eben H. Paxton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
Czechia | 1 | 14% |
Hungary | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 18% |
Unspecified | 3 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 5 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 27% |
Unspecified | 3 | 14% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 14% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 14% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 5 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2020.
All research outputs
#6,853,016
of 24,836,260 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#92,379
of 215,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,368
of 402,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,052
of 2,721 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,836,260 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,721 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.