↓ Skip to main content

Stable isotope analysis of multiple tissues from Hawaiian honeycreepers indicates elevational movement

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stable isotope analysis of multiple tissues from Hawaiian honeycreepers indicates elevational movement
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2020
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0235752
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristina L. Paxton, Jeffery F. Kelly, Sandra M. Pletchet, Eben H. Paxton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Lecturer 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 75%
Environmental Science 1 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,517,059
of 18,382,898 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#48,857
of 169,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,336
of 240,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#75
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,382,898 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 169,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.