You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Diretrizes para o tratamento farmacológico da COVID-19. Consenso da Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira, da Sociedade Brasileira de Infectologia e da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, July 2020
|
DOI | 10.5935/0103-507x.20200039 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maicon Falavigna, Verônica Colpani, Cinara Stein, Luciano Cesar Pontes Azevedo, Angela Maria Bagattini, Gabriela Vilela de Brito, José Miguel Chatkin, Sergio Cimerman, Mirian de Freitas Dal Ben Corradi, Clovis Arns da Cunha, Flávia Cordeiro de Medeiros, Haliton Alves de Oliveira, Leandro Genehr Fritscher, Marcelo Basso Gazzana, Débora Dalmas Gräf, Lays Pires Marra, Jessica Yumi Matuoka, Michelle Silva Nunes, Daniela Vianna Pachito, Cássia Garcia Moraes Pagano, Patrícia do Carmo Silva Parreira, Rachel Riera, Amilton Silva Júnior, Bruno de Melo Tavares, Alexandre Prehn Zavascki, Regis Goulart Rosa, Felipe Dal-Pizzol |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 5 | 38% |
Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 92% |
Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 327 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 74 | 23% |
Student > Master | 30 | 9% |
Researcher | 14 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 3% |
Professor | 10 | 3% |
Other | 39 | 12% |
Unknown | 150 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 21% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 35 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
Other | 26 | 8% |
Unknown | 161 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,761,708
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#16
of 350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,909
of 430,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them