You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections of insulin for pregnant women with diabetes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005542.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diane Farrar, Derek J Tuffnell, Jane West, Helen M West |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Argentina | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 631 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 627 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 100 | 16% |
| Researcher | 72 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 55 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 32 | 5% |
| Other | 104 | 16% |
| Unknown | 205 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 178 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 72 | 11% |
| Psychology | 45 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 3% |
| Other | 72 | 11% |
| Unknown | 225 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2018.
All research outputs
#3,409,226
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,045
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,275
of 355,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#124
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.