↓ Skip to main content

1,135 Genomes Reveal the Global Pattern of Polymorphism in Arabidopsis thaliana

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1065 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1135 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
1,135 Genomes Reveal the Global Pattern of Polymorphism in Arabidopsis thaliana
Published in
Cell, June 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.063
Pubmed ID
Authors

The 1001 Genomes Consortium, Carlos Alonso-Blanco, Jorge Andrade, Claude Becker, Felix Bemm, Joy Bergelson, Karsten M. Borgwardt, Jun Cao, Eunyoung Chae, Todd M. Dezwaan, Wei Ding, Joseph R. Ecker, Moises Exposito-Alonso, Ashley Farlow, Joffrey Fitz, Xiangchao Gan, Dominik G. Grimm, Angela M. Hancock, Stefan R. Henz, Svante Holm, Matthew Horton, Mike Jarsulic, Randall A. Kerstetter, Arthur Korte, Pamela Korte, Christa Lanz, Cheng-Ruei Lee, Dazhe Meng, Todd P. Michael, Richard Mott, Ni Wayan Muliyati, Thomas Nägele, Matthias Nagler, Viktoria Nizhynska, Magnus Nordborg, Polina Yu. Novikova, F. Xavier Picó, Alexander Platzer, Fernando A. Rabanal, Alex Rodriguez, Beth A. Rowan, Patrice A. Salomé, Karl J. Schmid, Robert J. Schmitz, Ümit Seren, Felice Gianluca Sperone, Mitchell Sudkamp, Hannes Svardal, Matt M. Tanzer, Donald Todd, Samuel L. Volchenboum, Congmao Wang, George Wang, Xi Wang, Wolfram Weckwerth, Detlef Weigel, Xuefeng Zhou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 220 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 11 <1%
Unknown 1102 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 251 22%
Researcher 224 20%
Student > Master 126 11%
Student > Bachelor 109 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 45 4%
Other 153 13%
Unknown 227 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 555 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 245 22%
Computer Science 18 2%
Environmental Science 15 1%
Chemistry 6 <1%
Other 49 4%
Unknown 247 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 202. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#198,226
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#1,100
of 17,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,776
of 358,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#17
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.