↓ Skip to main content

Immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant adenovirus type-5-vectored COVID-19 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18 years or older: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 35,356)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
426 Mendeley
Title
Immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant adenovirus type-5-vectored COVID-19 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18 years or older: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial
Published in
The Lancet, August 2020
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31605-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Feng-Cai Zhu, Xu-Hua Guan, Yu-Hua Li, Jian-Ying Huang, Tao Jiang, Li-Hua Hou, Jing-Xin Li, Bei-Fang Yang, Ling Wang, Wen-Juan Wang, Shi-Po Wu, Zhao Wang, Xiao-Hong Wu, Jun-Jie Xu, Zhe Zhang, Si-Yue Jia, Bu-Sen Wang, Yi Hu, Jing-Jing Liu, Jun Zhang, Xiao-Ai Qian, Qiong Li, Hong-Xing Pan, Hu-Dachuan Jiang, Peng Deng, Jin-Bo Gou, Xue-Wen Wang, Xing-Huan Wang, Wei Chen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,070 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 426 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 426 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 61 14%
Student > Bachelor 52 12%
Other 50 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 9%
Student > Master 37 9%
Other 96 23%
Unknown 91 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 47 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 40 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 4%
Other 77 18%
Unknown 120 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3645. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2020.
All research outputs
#543
of 16,094,382 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#47
of 35,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86
of 299,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#7
of 396 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,094,382 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 396 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.