↓ Skip to main content

Evidence-based prevention of Alzheimer's disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of 243 observational prospective studies and 153 randomised controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 7,331)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
138 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
974 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
10 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
4 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
315 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
759 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence-based prevention of Alzheimer's disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of 243 observational prospective studies and 153 randomised controlled trials
Published in
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, July 2020
DOI 10.1136/jnnp-2019-321913
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jin-Tai Yu, Wei Xu, Chen-Chen Tan, Sandrine Andrieu, John Suckling, Evangelos Evangelou, An Pan, Can Zhang, Jianping Jia, Lei Feng, Ee-Heok Kua, Yan-Jiang Wang, Hui-Fu Wang, Meng-Shan Tan, Jie-Qiong Li, Xiao-He Hou, Yu Wan, Lin Tan, Vincent Mok, Lan Tan, Qiang Dong, Jacques Touchon, Serge Gauthier, Paul S Aisen, Bruno Vellas

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 974 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 759 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 759 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 79 10%
Student > Master 77 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 8%
Student > Bachelor 61 8%
Other 47 6%
Other 165 22%
Unknown 269 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 162 21%
Neuroscience 76 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 7%
Psychology 44 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 3%
Other 96 13%
Unknown 308 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1713. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2024.
All research outputs
#6,610
of 26,243,295 outputs
Outputs from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#3
of 7,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#346
of 434,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#1
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,295 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.