You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of pain models to detect opioid-induced hyperalgesia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s27738 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sumithra Krishnan, Amy Salter, Thomas Sullivan, Melanie Gentgall, Jason White, Paul Rolan |
Abstract |
Chronic opioid therapy may be associated with hyperalgesia. Our objective was to determine if opioid-induced hyperalgesia detection sensitivity is dependent on the stimulus used to detect it. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 53 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 20% |
Researcher | 9 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
Other | 11 | 20% |
Unknown | 6 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 35% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 17% |
Psychology | 7 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2012.
All research outputs
#16,188,873
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#1,170
of 1,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,263
of 173,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.