You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Deep MRD profiling defines outcome and unveils different modes of treatment resistance in standard- and high-risk myeloma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Blood, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1182/blood.2020006731 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ibai Goicoechea, Noemi Puig, Maria-Teresa Cedena, Leire Burgos, Lourdes Cordón, María-Belén Vidriales, Juan Flores-Montero, Norma C. Gutierrez, Maria-Jose Calasanz, Maria-Luisa Martin Ramos, David Lara-Astiaso, Amaia Vilas-Zornoza, Diego Alignani, Idoia Rodriguez, Sarai Sarvide, Daniel Alameda, Juan José Garcés, Sara Rodriguez, Vicente Fresquet, Jon Celay, Ramón Garcia-Sanz, Joaquin Martinez-Lopez, Albert Oriol, Rafael Rios, Jesus Martin-Sanchez, Rafael Martinez-Martinez, Josep Sarra, Miguel-Teodoro Hernandez, Javier de la Rubia, Isabel Krsnik, Jose-Maria Moraleda, Luis Palomera, Joan Bargay, Jose-Angel Martinez-Climent, Alberto Orfao, Laura Rosiñol, Maria-Victoria Mateos, Juan-José Lahuerta, Joan Blade, Jesús San Miguel, Bruno Paiva |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 28% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 22% |
| Scientists | 4 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 18% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 30 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 35 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,602,480
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#1,398
of 33,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,618
of 531,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#26
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 531,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.