You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comment on “Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behavior measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12966-016-0392-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Caroline B. Terwee, L. B. Mokkink, L. M. Hidding, T. M. Altenburg, M. N. van Poppel, M. J. M. Chinapaw |
| Abstract |
With great interest we read the article by Kelly et al. on the measurement of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) (Kelly P et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 13:(1) 32, 2016). We appreciate the invitation of the authors to provide feedback on their ideas and we take this opportunity to contribute to the discussion. Our main proposition is that this field can learn much from the field of quality of life research and the methodology developed for validating quality of life questionnaires. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 26% |
| Australia | 4 | 21% |
| United States | 3 | 16% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 42% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 20% |
| Unknown | 23 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2017.
All research outputs
#3,009,075
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,001
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,278
of 360,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#22
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.