↓ Skip to main content

Funding for malaria control 2006–2010: A comprehensive global assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Funding for malaria control 2006–2010: A comprehensive global assessment
Published in
Malaria Journal, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-11-246
Pubmed ID
Authors

David M Pigott, Rifat Atun, Catherine L Moyes, Simon I Hay, Peter W Gething

Abstract

The last decade has seen a dramatic increase in international and domestic funding for malaria control, coupled with important declines in malaria incidence and mortality in some regions of the world. As the ongoing climate of financial uncertainty places strains on investment in global health, there is an increasing need to audit the origin, recipients and geographical distribution of funding for malaria control relative to populations at risk of the disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 137 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 18%
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 26 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 18%
Social Sciences 11 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Environmental Science 8 6%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 30 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,033,455
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#686
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,587
of 167,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#11
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.