↓ Skip to main content

The Mitotic Spindle

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 8: The Mitotic Spindle
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Mitotic Spindle
Chapter number 8
Book title
The Mitotic Spindle
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3542-0_8
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3540-6, 978-1-4939-3542-0
Authors

Miell, Matthew D D, Straight, Aaron F, Matthew D. D. Miell, Aaron F. Straight, Miell, Matthew D. D., Straight, Aaron F.

Editors

Paul Chang, Ryoma Ohi

Abstract

The kinetochore is the primary site of interaction between chromosomes and microtubules of the mitotic spindle during chromosome segregation. Kinetochores are composed of more than 100 proteins that transiently assemble during mitosis at a single epigenetically defined region on each chromosome, known as the centromere. Kinetochore assembly and activity must be tightly regulated to ensure proper microtubule interaction and faithful chromosome segregation. Kinetochore malfunction can result in chromosome segregation defects leading to aneuploidy and cell death. As such, cell free and reconstituted systems to analyze kinetochore formation and function are invaluable in probing the biochemical activities of kinetochores. In vitro approaches to studying kinetochores have enabled the manipulation of kinetochore protein structure, function, interactions, and regulation that are not possible in cells. Here we outline a cell-free approach for the assembly of centromeres and recruitment of functional kinetochores that enables their manipulation and analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Neuroscience 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2017.
All research outputs
#6,566,111
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,843
of 14,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,948
of 401,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#212
of 1,466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,341 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.