| Title |
Global quieting of high-frequency seismic noise due to COVID-19 pandemic lockdown measures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.abd2438 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Lecocq, Stephen P Hicks, Koen Van Noten, Kasper van Wijk, Paula Koelemeijer, Raphael S M De Plaen, Frédérick Massin, Gregor Hillers, Robert E Anthony, Maria-Theresia Apoloner, Mario Arroyo-Solórzano, Jelle D Assink, Pinar Büyükakpınar, Andrea Cannata, Flavio Cannavo, Sebastian Carrasco, Corentin Caudron, Esteban J Chaves, David G Cornwell, David Craig, Olivier F C den Ouden, Jordi Diaz, Stefanie Donner, Christos P Evangelidis, Läslo Evers, Benoit Fauville, Gonzalo A Fernandez, Dimitrios Giannopoulos, Steven J Gibbons, Társilo Girona, Bogdan Grecu, Marc Grunberg, György Hetényi, Anna Horleston, Adolfo Inza, Jessica C E Irving, Mohammadreza Jamalreyhani, Alan Kafka, Mathijs R Koymans, Celeste R Labedz, Eric Larose, Nathaniel J Lindsey, Mika McKinnon, Tobias Megies, Meghan S Miller, William Minarik, Louis Moresi, Víctor H Márquez-Ramírez, Martin Möllhoff, Ian M Nesbitt, Shankho Niyogi, Javier Ojeda, Adrien Oth, Simon Proud, Jay Pulli, Lise Retailleau, Annukka E Rintamäki, Claudio Satriano, Martha K Savage, Shahar Shani-Kadmiel, Reinoud Sleeman, Efthimios Sokos, Klaus Stammler, Alexander E Stott, Shiba Subedi, Mathilde B Sørensen, Taka'aki Taira, Mar Tapia, Fatih Turhan, Ben van der Pluijm, Mark Vanstone, Jerome Vergne, Tommi A T Vuorinen, Tristram Warren, Joachim Wassermann, Han Xiao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,516 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 205 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 97 | 6% |
| France | 42 | 3% |
| Japan | 39 | 3% |
| Australia | 38 | 3% |
| Mexico | 29 | 2% |
| Chile | 27 | 2% |
| Germany | 26 | 2% |
| Spain | 25 | 2% |
| Other | 292 | 19% |
| Unknown | 696 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1158 | 76% |
| Scientists | 289 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 35 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 33 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 409 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 409 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 65 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 76 | 19% |
| Unknown | 110 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 106 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 99 | 24% |
| Unknown | 127 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3129. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,067
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from Science
#118
of 83,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133
of 430,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#3
of 992 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 992 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.