↓ Skip to main content

Identifying and prioritizing human behaviors that benefit biodiversity

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Science and Practice, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 431)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
129 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying and prioritizing human behaviors that benefit biodiversity
Published in
Conservation Science and Practice, July 2020
DOI 10.1111/csp2.249
Authors

Matthew J. Selinske, Georgia E. Garrard, Emily A. Gregg, Alexander M. Kusmanoff, Lindall R. Kidd, Meghan T. Cullen, Michelle Cooper, William L. Geary, Melissa A. Hatty, Fern Hames, Sarah Kneebone, Emily M. McLeod, Euan G. Ritchie, Zoe E. Squires, Janelle Thomas, Madelaine A. W. Willcock, Sera Blair, Sarah A. Bekessy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 129 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 25%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 12 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 19%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 6%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 12 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2021.
All research outputs
#243,915
of 17,733,079 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Science and Practice
#15
of 431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,904
of 301,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Science and Practice
#2
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,733,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.