↓ Skip to main content

Why workers’ turnover is so high: managed flexibility and the intermediary chain of China’s migrant labor market

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Chinese Sociology, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why workers’ turnover is so high: managed flexibility and the intermediary chain of China’s migrant labor market
Published in
The Journal of Chinese Sociology, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40711-020-00120-z
Authors

Zixi Liu, Jianghuafeng Zhu

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,974,036
of 16,073,961 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Chinese Sociology
#9
of 37 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,531
of 298,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Chinese Sociology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,073,961 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one scored the same or higher as 28 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them