You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
SHiNeMaS: a web tool dedicated to seed lots history, phenotyping and cultural practices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-020-00640-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yannick De Oliveira, Laura Burlot, Julie C. Dawson, Isabelle Goldringer, Darkawi Madi, Pierre Rivière, Delphine Steinbach, Gaëlle van Frank, Mathieu Thomas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 1 | 14% |
| Mexico | 1 | 14% |
| Brazil | 1 | 14% |
| France | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 43% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2020.
All research outputs
#6,504,342
of 23,223,705 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#403
of 1,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,469
of 399,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#15
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,223,705 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,098 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.