You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Implications for paleomobility studies of the effects of quaternary volcanism on bioavailable strontium: A test case in North Patagonia (Argentina)
Journal of Archaeological Science, September 2020
Alejandro Serna, Luciano Prates, Emiliano Mange, Domingo C. Salazar-García, Clement P. Bataille
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||3||50%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||17%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||3||15%|
|Student > Bachelor||2||10%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||1||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||2||10%|
|Arts and Humanities||1||5%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2022.
All research outputs
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Science
of 2,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 399,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Science
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.