↓ Skip to main content

Forest biomass and wood consumption In the lower course of the Amazon: a case study of rhe Urubueua Island

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Amazonica, March 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 370)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Forest biomass and wood consumption In the lower course of the Amazon: a case study of rhe Urubueua Island
Published in
Acta Amazonica, March 1999
DOI 10.1590/1809-43921999291095
Authors

Akio TSUCHIYA, Mario HIRAOKA

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 40%
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Researcher 2 20%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 70%
Environmental Science 2 20%
Social Sciences 1 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#5,616,196
of 17,383,690 outputs
Outputs from Acta Amazonica
#23
of 370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,704
of 300,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Amazonica
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,383,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 370 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them