↓ Skip to main content

Total versus subtotal hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Total versus subtotal hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004993.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Lethaby, Asima Mukhopadhyay, Raj Naik

Abstract

Hysterectomy using an abdominal approach removes either the uterus alone (subtotal hysterectomy) or both the uterus and the cervix (total hysterectomy). The latter is more common but the outcomes have not been systematically compared.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Student > Master 15 15%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Other 11 11%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 18 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Psychology 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 22 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,026,977
of 12,739,396 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,293
of 10,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,875
of 120,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,739,396 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.