↓ Skip to main content

Banco Nacional: jogo de Ponzi, PROER e FCVS

Overview of attention for article published in Revista de Economia Política, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 173)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Banco Nacional: jogo de Ponzi, PROER e FCVS
Published in
Revista de Economia Política, March 2008
DOI 10.1590/s0101-31572008000100005
Authors

Fernando de Holanda Barbosa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,319,955
of 19,302,634 outputs
Outputs from Revista de Economia Política
#7
of 173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,507
of 306,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista de Economia Política
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,302,634 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 173 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them