↓ Skip to main content

DNA metabarcoding of feces to infer summer diet of Pacific walruses

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Mammal Science, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DNA metabarcoding of feces to infer summer diet of Pacific walruses
Published in
Marine Mammal Science, July 2020
DOI 10.1111/mms.12717
Authors

Sarah A. Sonsthagen, Chadwick V. Jay, Robert S. Cornman, Anthony S. Fischbach, Jacqueline M. Grebmeier, Sandra L. Talbot

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 64%
Engineering 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2020.
All research outputs
#14,729,525
of 18,414,344 outputs
Outputs from Marine Mammal Science
#1,054
of 1,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,226
of 304,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Mammal Science
#26
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,414,344 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.