↓ Skip to main content

Factors associated with utilization of community health workers in improving access to malaria treatment among children in Kenya

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors associated with utilization of community health workers in improving access to malaria treatment among children in Kenya
Published in
Malaria Journal, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-11-248
Pubmed ID
Authors

James Kisia, Florence Nelima, David Odhiambo Otieno, Kioko Kiilu, Wamalwa Emmanuel, Salim Sohani, Kendra Siekmans, Andrew Nyandigisi, Willis Akhwale

Abstract

The success of community case management in improving access to effective malaria treatment for young children relies on broad utilization of community health workers (CHWs) to diagnose and treat fever cases. A better understanding of the factors associated with CHW utilization is crucial in informing national malaria control policy and strategy in Kenya. Specifically, little is known in Kenya on the extent to which CHWs are utilized, the characteristics of families who report utilizing CHWs and whether utilization is associated with improved access to prompt and effective malaria treatment. This paper examines factors associated with utilization of CHWs in improving access to malaria treatment among children under five years of age by women caregivers in two malaria endemic districts in Kenya.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Unknown 185 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 12%
Researcher 22 11%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Other 47 24%
Unknown 34 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 31%
Social Sciences 25 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 8%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 39 20%