@robertwplatt @EpiEllie @PWGTennant I recommend you this paper from JACC: https://t.co/mQgIFeoaHU
@barttels2 @GidMK Is common sense all that common? https://t.co/pcVutJJtWp via @ACFanaroff et al https://t.co/UVdB9SR44g
@anish_koka @drjohnm https://t.co/AW8WjZRGPY Here you have an (very incomplete) list in cardiology from the last 50 years.
@GGCCdoc @matthieugarby @DustBin00 @Nicolas_Jacob_ @Scintigraphiste Va falloir un peu muscler le jeu de ton épistémologie, on parle études longitudinales de terrain, pas uniquement mécanismes physiologiques. Tu veux que je te rappelle en quoi on peut pas e
@dylanarmbruste3 A detailer list of observational failuers in caridology in the last 50 years: https://t.co/AW8Wk09iey
@tdietterich @smueller @yudapearl @stevekrouse @trunghlt @YiMaTweets Among a large list of failed examples in obs data, you can see this interesting paper (Journal of the American College of Cardiology). https://t.co/AW8Wk09iey "...Well-conducted RCTs ha
@dataengines @yudapearl Here a list of observational and failures from the last 50 years in cardiology from the Journal of the American College of Cardiology https://t.co/AW8WjZRGPY "...Well-conducted RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported
@PavlosMsaouel @stephensenn @Lester_Domes @arthur_alb1 @LeoFurlanPhD @MaartenvSmeden @jd_wilko I recommend you this paper from The American Journal of Cardiology "...Well-conducted RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense and c
@JHowardBrainMD @SciencePartisan @ChristosArgyrop I recommend to you this paper from the American Journal of Cardiology. https://t.co/AW8Wk09iey
@yudapearl Wrong again and again. You always promotes bad epistemiology and bad scientific evidence. https://t.co/AW8Wk09iey
@AnoopRKulkarni @yudapearl "...Well-conducted RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense and clinical observation..." https://t.co/AW8Wk09iey
@JonasChoice @PHuenermund @JonasChoice I work in cardiology.. here you have an interesting and recent paper in JACC (one of the most important magazines in cardiology) about this if you are interested: https://t.co/AW8Wk09iey
@yudapearl @soboleffspaces @IJCAIconf Yes, we don't want subjectivity in clinical decision making. Is unethical, dangerous and can be harmful. Prospective observarional studies are unethical. There are many examples in cariology in the last 50 years. Again
@yudapearl @soboleffspaces @IJCAIconf Why do you always ask things that have been answered 10000 times???... Because prior expert knowledge is dangerous and unethical and RCT systematically contradicts common sense and expert knowledge. READ THIS PAPER:
RT @AdamMeakins: Good Science > Your Feelings Randomised Controlled Trials have their issues, but they most definitely over rule your feel…
RT @AdamMeakins: Good Science > Your Feelings Randomised Controlled Trials have their issues, but they most definitely over rule your feel…
RT @AdamMeakins: Good Science > Your Feelings Randomised Controlled Trials have their issues, but they most definitely over rule your feel…
RT @AdamMeakins: Good Science > Your Feelings Randomised Controlled Trials have their issues, but they most definitely over rule your feel…
RT @AdamMeakins: Good Science > Your Feelings Randomised Controlled Trials have their issues, but they most definitely over rule your feel…
Good Science > Your Feelings Randomised Controlled Trials have their issues, but they most definitely over rule your feelings of ‘common sense’! https://t.co/sImQpUX45j
@load_dependent @NoahHaber Well, in general is the opposite: https://t.co/AW8Wk09iey "...Well-conducted RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense and clinical observation..."
@vascobrazao @NoahHaber And you, read this paper from JACC. Is a extrenpmy important paper kn cardiology. https://t.co/AW8Wk09iey
@mikejohansenmd Many in fact! Read this very interesting paper from JACC https://t.co/AW8Wk09iey
@VictorDayan1 @EnochAkowuah1 Yes, heart team is guided for common sense... Read this JACC: "...Well-conducted RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense and clinical observation..." https://t.co/AW8Wk09iey
@VictorDayan1 Read this paper from JACC: https://t.co/AW8Wk09iey
@nickinpractice @davidad @eliasbareinboim @victorveitch @RichardMCNgo @SmithaMilli @tom4everitt @ryancareyai @gusl @yudapearl 5/n: Well-conducted RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense, expert knowledge and clinical observati
@snoble @yudapearl This is the huge danger of Judea's fallacy. There are many examples where observarional studies completly fails in health. Read this too... https://t.co/AW8Wk09iey
@_MiguelHernan @HarvardEpi @CAUSALab I'm sorry to say but the dichotomy you say is an essential fallacy. Read this paper from the most important magazine in cardiology. https://t.co/AW8Wk09iey
@EpiEllie Nops, you are wrong. This is the most used fallacy from epidemiologists. EBM says just the opposite. Read this very interesting paper frim JACC:https://t.co/AW8Wk09iey "Well-conducted RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by commo
RT @heorfy: "(...)randomization remains a critical tool to understand the causal relationship between treatments and outcomes." Randomized…
RT @RWJE_BA: You must to read this JACC paper CI folks!! Observational studies is a false solution. https://t.co/AW8Wk09iey @_MiguelHernan…
"(...)randomization remains a critical tool to understand the causal relationship between treatments and outcomes." Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation: JACC Review Topic of the Week https://t.co/IVdezfP4e7
さすがCASTの悪夢を知っている循環器の人々。観察研究だけでいいとか単なる不勉強ですよね。
RT @RWJE_BA: You must to read this JACC paper CI folks!! Observational studies is a false solution. https://t.co/AW8Wk09iey @_MiguelHernan…
RT @RWJE_BA: You must to read this JACC paper CI folks!! Observational studies is a false solution. https://t.co/AW8Wk09iey @_MiguelHernan…
RT @RWJE_BA: You must to read this JACC paper CI folks!! Observational studies is a false solution. https://t.co/AW8Wk09iey @_MiguelHernan…
RT @RWJE_BA: You must to read this JACC paper CI folks!! Observational studies is a false solution. https://t.co/AW8Wk09iey @_MiguelHernan…
RT @RWJE_BA: You must to read this JACC paper CI folks!! Observational studies is a false solution. https://t.co/AW8Wk09iey @_MiguelHernan…
You must to read this JACC paper CI folks!! Observational studies is a false solution. https://t.co/AW8Wk09iey @_MiguelHernan @yudapearl @EpiEllie @statsepi @stephensenn @f2harrell
(Faranoff et al. 2020) is a good paper on this https://t.co/eluGBUTCCt
@drjohnm This review article discusses a few examples - @jaccjournals https://t.co/tKlDCd3lwm
RT @DavidLBrownMD: Timely! From @jaccjournals https://t.co/vnOVNtxwgB
RT @HanCardiomd: Well-conducted #RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense and clinical observation Common sen…
RT @HanCardiomd: Well-conducted #RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense and clinical observation Common sen…
RT @DavidLBrownMD: Timely! From @jaccjournals https://t.co/vnOVNtxwgB
RT @HanCardiomd: Well-conducted #RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense and clinical observation Common sen…
RT @CMichaelGibson: Given availability of real-world data & advanced data analytic tools, it is claimed that common sense & clinical observ…
RT @HanCardiomd: Well-conducted #RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense and clinical observation Common sen…
RT @drdavemd: A excellent review in @JACCJournals that summarizes examples of how common sense or observational findings need to be evaluat…
RT @CMichaelGibson: Given availability of real-world data & advanced data analytic tools, it is claimed that common sense & clinical observ…
RT @DavidLBrownMD: Timely! From @jaccjournals https://t.co/vnOVNtxwgB
RT @DavidLBrownMD: Timely! From @jaccjournals https://t.co/vnOVNtxwgB
RT @CMichaelGibson: Given availability of real-world data & advanced data analytic tools, it is claimed that common sense & clinical observ…
RT @CMichaelGibson: Given availability of real-world data & advanced data analytic tools, it is claimed that common sense & clinical observ…
If there's anything that science teaches us consistently, it's that, in many cases, reality has a tendency to confound us. RCTs >>>>> common sense.
RT @CMichaelGibson: Given availability of real-world data & advanced data analytic tools, it is claimed that common sense & clinical observ…
RT @CMichaelGibson: Given availability of real-world data & advanced data analytic tools, it is claimed that common sense & clinical observ…
RT @CMichaelGibson: Given availability of real-world data & advanced data analytic tools, it is claimed that common sense & clinical observ…
Given availability of real-world data & advanced data analytic tools, it is claimed that common sense & clinical observation, rather than RCTs, should support clinical decision-making. Results from RCTs however have repeatedly contradicted real wor
RT @RenatoDLopes1: Really nice and important paper that we wrote with great friends and colleagues about the importance of RCTs to determin…
RT @RenatoDLopes1: Really nice and important paper that we wrote with great friends and colleagues about the importance of RCTs to determin…
Randomization: There is no Substitute https://t.co/EUwph7CxGN
RT @HanCardiomd: Well-conducted #RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense and clinical observation Common sen…
Really nice and important paper that we wrote with great friends and colleagues about the importance of RCTs to determine treatment effect in Medicine. Worth reading it.
RT @DavidLBrownMD: Timely! From @jaccjournals https://t.co/vnOVNtxwgB
RT @HanCardiomd: Well-conducted #RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense and clinical observation Common sen…
RT @HanCardiomd: Well-conducted #RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense and clinical observation Common sen…
Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation https://t.co/aDFNkRxXff via @ACFanaroff & @DrCaliff_FDA et al https://t.co/tqU6bsABXJ
RT @HanCardiomd: Well-conducted #RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense and clinical observation Common sen…
RT @HanCardiomd: Well-conducted #RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense and clinical observation Common sen…
RT @AskDrShashank: How evidence beats common sense ? Worth a read
RT @SABOURETCardio: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation: Worth to read https://t.co/IS92NDNtmr
RT @DavidLBrownMD: Timely! From @jaccjournals https://t.co/vnOVNtxwgB
RT @HanCardiomd: Well-conducted #RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense and clinical observation Common sen…
RT @HanCardiomd: Well-conducted #RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense and clinical observation Common sen…
RT @HanCardiomd: Well-conducted #RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense and clinical observation Common sen…
RT @HanCardiomd: Well-conducted #RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense and clinical observation Common sen…
How evidence beats common sense ? Worth a read
RT @HanCardiomd: Well-conducted #RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense and clinical observation Common sen…
RT @HanCardiomd: Well-conducted #RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense and clinical observation Common sen…
RT @HanCardiomd: Well-conducted #RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense and clinical observation Common sen…
RT @HanCardiomd: Well-conducted #RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense and clinical observation Common sen…
RT @HanCardiomd: Well-conducted #RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense and clinical observation Common sen…
RT @HanCardiomd: Well-conducted #RCTs have repeatedly contradicted practices supported by common sense and clinical observation Common sen…
RT @SABOURETCardio: Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation: Worth to read https://t.co/IS92NDNtmr
Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation: Worth to read https://t.co/IS92NDNtmr
Randomized Trials Versus Common Sense and Clinical Observation. Congrats @ACFanaroff for a very well done review article https://t.co/4uqFg7K5vH
RT @DavidLBrownMD: Timely! From @jaccjournals https://t.co/vnOVNtxwgB
RT @drdavemd: A excellent review in @JACCJournals that summarizes examples of how common sense or observational findings need to be evaluat…