↓ Skip to main content

Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
17 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004345.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edmund Bailey, Wafa Kashbour, Neha Shah, Helen V Worthington, Tara F Renton, Paul Coulthard

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,003,810
of 15,897,991 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,777
of 11,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,567
of 287,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,897,991 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.