| Title |
Provision of ECPR during COVID-19: evidence, equity, and ethical dilemmas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03172-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elliott Worku, Denzil Gill, Daniel Brodie, Roberto Lorusso, Alain Combes, Kiran Shekar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 9% |
| Italy | 3 | 7% |
| Spain | 3 | 7% |
| India | 2 | 5% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 23% |
| Scientists | 5 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 15% |
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 34 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 35 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,638,807
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,445
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,545
of 427,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#58
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.