↓ Skip to main content

Topical treatment for facial burns

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
287 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Topical treatment for facial burns
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008058.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cornelis J Hoogewerf, M Jenda Hop, Marianne K Nieuwenhuis, Irma Mmh Oen, Esther Middelkoop, Margriet E Van Baar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 287 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 286 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 9%
Student > Master 23 8%
Researcher 19 7%
Student > Postgraduate 17 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 53 18%
Unknown 135 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Unspecified 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Other 34 12%
Unknown 140 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2024.
All research outputs
#5,471,968
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,611
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,271
of 427,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#119
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.