| Title |
Adaptation of SARS-CoV-2 in BALB/c mice for testing vaccine efficacy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.abc4730 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hongjing Gu, Qi Chen, Guan Yang, Lei He, Hang Fan, Yong-Qiang Deng, Yanxiao Wang, Yue Teng, Zhongpeng Zhao, Yujun Cui, Yuchang Li, Xiao-Feng Li, Jiangfan Li, Na-Na Zhang, Xiaolan Yang, Shaolong Chen, Yan Guo, Guangyu Zhao, Xiliang Wang, De-Yan Luo, Hui Wang, Xiao Yang, Yan Li, Gencheng Han, Yuxian He, Xiaojun Zhou, Shusheng Geng, Xiaoli Sheng, Shibo Jiang, Shihui Sun, Cheng-Feng Qin, Yusen Zhou |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,562 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 173 | 11% |
| Japan | 68 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 62 | 4% |
| Spain | 56 | 4% |
| Turkey | 44 | 3% |
| Germany | 32 | 2% |
| Peru | 29 | 2% |
| Canada | 23 | 1% |
| Australia | 20 | 1% |
| Other | 205 | 13% |
| Unknown | 850 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1338 | 86% |
| Scientists | 163 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 37 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 22 | 1% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 495 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 495 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 68 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 87 | 18% |
| Unknown | 161 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 78 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 51 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 87 | 18% |
| Unknown | 183 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2502. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,926
of 24,514,423 outputs
Outputs from Science
#163
of 79,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179
of 415,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#13
of 980 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,514,423 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 980 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.