↓ Skip to main content

Breast reconstruction after neoadjuvant radio chemotherapy: review and personal technique IDEAL concept

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Medical Research, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Breast reconstruction after neoadjuvant radio chemotherapy: review and personal technique IDEAL concept
Published in
European Journal of Medical Research, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40001-016-0219-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolin Nestle-Krämling, Edwin Bölke, Wilfried Budach, Christoph Andree

Abstract

Neoadjuvant radio chemotherapy and immediate reconstruction for breast cancer are still under debate. But there are recent abstracts and articles which show that neoadjuvant radio chemotherapy is feasible and could improve the clinical outcome of breast cancer patients. The aim of this review is to present the authors' techniques and approaches with regard to neoadjuvant radiation of breast cancer patients. It seems that the concept of immediate implant delayed autologous breast reconstruction could be a safe procedure that is at least equivalent to primary autologous reconstruction.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 39%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 78%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unknown 2 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2016.
All research outputs
#6,828,280
of 7,885,400 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Medical Research
#153
of 200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,521
of 268,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Medical Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,885,400 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 200 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them