↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Internationalizing Colonial War: On the Unintended Consequences of the Interventions of the International Committee of the Red Cross in SOUTH-EAST ASIA, 1945–1949*

Overview of attention for article published in Past & Present, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 942)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
159 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Summary Blogs Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Internationalizing Colonial War: On the Unintended Consequences of the Interventions of the International Committee of the Red Cross in SOUTH-EAST ASIA, 1945–1949*
Published in
Past & Present, July 2020
DOI 10.1093/pastj/gtaa009
Authors

Boyd van Dijk

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 159 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 38%
Lecturer 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 4 50%
Social Sciences 3 38%
Neuroscience 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 104. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2021.
All research outputs
#354,677
of 23,418,312 outputs
Outputs from Past & Present
#20
of 942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,559
of 399,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Past & Present
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,418,312 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.

This page is provided by Altmetric.